{"id":8990,"date":"2014-07-27T03:21:05","date_gmt":"2014-07-27T10:21:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/?p=8990"},"modified":"2014-07-23T09:42:27","modified_gmt":"2014-07-23T16:42:27","slug":"cuviers-kinglet-again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2014\/07\/27\/cuviers-kinglet-again\/","title":{"rendered":"Cuvier&#8217;s Kinglet, Again"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With the recent apparent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mail-archive.com\/birdalert@ontbirds.ca\/msg33364.html\">rediscovery in Ontario<\/a> of the <a href=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2013\/05\/11\/the-bunting-or-the-egg\/\">Townsend&#8217;s bunting<\/a>, John James <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dvoc.org\/CassiniaOnLine\/Cassinia70\/C70_22_24.pdf\">Audubon&#8217;s &#8220;nonce species<\/a>&#8221; are back in the news. When pressed, most birders can name\u00a0the bunting, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dvoc.org\/CassiniaOnLine\/Cassinia70\/C70_11_21.pdf\">small-headed flycatcher<\/a>, and <a href=\"http:\/\/sibleyguides.blogspot.com\/2008\/03\/audubons-mysteries-carbonated-swamp.html\">the two warblers<\/a>; but the fifth &#8211;and the most visually appealing &#8212; of the Audubonian mysteries for some reason gets no respect.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/images.library.pitt.edu\/cgi-bin\/i\/image\/image-idx?view=entry;cc=audimg;entryid=x-aud0055\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-8992\" src=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/Screenshot-2014-07-23-09.52.09.png\" alt=\"Cuvier's kinglet\" width=\"441\" height=\"441\" srcset=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/Screenshot-2014-07-23-09.52.09.png 441w, http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/Screenshot-2014-07-23-09.52.09-150x150.png 150w, http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/Screenshot-2014-07-23-09.52.09-300x300.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 441px) 100vw, 441px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Audubon collected a male of\u00a0&#8220;this pretty and rare species&#8221; in Pennsylvania in the early summer of 1812. Nineteen years later, when he published the first volume of the <a href=\"http:\/\/digital.library.pitt.edu\/cgi-bin\/t\/text\/pageviewer-idx?c=darltext;cc=darltext;idno=31735056284882;q1=ornithological%20biography;frm=frameset;view=image;seq=5;page=root;size=s\"><em>Ornithological Biography<\/em><\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/digital.library.pitt.edu\/cgi-bin\/t\/text\/pageviewer-idx?c=darltext&amp;cc=darltext&amp;idno=31735056284882&amp;q1=ornithological+biography&amp;frm=frameset&amp;view=image&amp;seq=314\">he had never seen another<\/a>, and was\u00a0unable<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>to learn that this species has been observed by any other individual.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In fact, however, Cuvier&#8217;s kinglet (<a href=\"http:\/\/digital.library.pitt.edu\/cgi-bin\/t\/text\/pageviewer-idx?c=darltext&amp;cc=darltext&amp;idno=31735056284882&amp;q1=ornithological+biography&amp;frm=frameset&amp;view=image&amp;seq=314\">named<\/a>, over Charles Bonaparte&#8217;s recommendation, for &#8220;one at present unrivalled in the knowledge of general Zoology&#8221;) did enjoy\u00a0&#8212; unlike Audubon&#8217;s other unica &#8212; \u00a0a modest afterlife in the nineteenth century.<\/p>\n<p>In both editions of the\u00a0<em>Manual,\u00a0<\/em>for example,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/28912#page\/432\/mode\/1up\">Thomas Nuttall<\/a>\u00a0proclaimed himself thoroughly convinced of the legitimacy of &#8220;this &#8230; interesting addition to the North American Fauna,&#8221; than which<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>no species can be better marked or more strikingly distinguished.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Audubon himself seems never to have given up hope. In 1840, he <a href=\"https:\/\/sora.unm.edu\/sites\/default\/files\/journals\/auk\/v023n02\/p0194-p0209.pdf\">corresponded with Spencer Fullerton Baird<\/a> about a &#8220;singular variety&#8221; of the ruby-crowned kinglet the seventeen-year-old\u00a0Baird had shot that spring:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Have you compared the Regulus with the description of Regulus Cuvieri? Could you not send me your bird to look at?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>So far as I know, Baird never replied, but the Nestor of American ornithology was still more or less in the camp of\u00a0the believers nearly twenty years later (and seven years after Audubon&#8217;s death), when he included the Cuvier&#8217;s golden crest in his 1858 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/33120#page\/293\/mode\/1up\">report on the birds of the railroad surveys<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I have introduced the diagnosis of this species from Audubon for the sake of calling attention to it and of completing the account of the genus.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There was still no second record of the species (or, as the author\u00a0rather pointedly recalls, &#8220;of several other species not found in the United States by any one else&#8221; but Audubon), and Baird&#8217;s uncertainty would be\u00a0noticeably greater in the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/31735#page\/107\/mode\/1up\"><em>History<\/em>\u00a0of 1874<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This species continues to be unknown, except from the description of Mr. Audubon&#8230;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Elliott Coues did not even number the species <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/49581#page\/94\/mode\/1up\">in his 1872 <em>Key<\/em><\/a>, observing in a note only that the bird was &#8220;not now known.&#8221;\u00a0T<a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/33132#page\/318\/mode\/1up\">he final edition<\/a> of the\u00a0<em>Key\u00a0<\/em>has nothing to add:\u00a0<em>R. cuvieri<\/em><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>continues unknown.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Not unknown to everyone, though.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/7\/7f\/Alexander_Milton_Ross.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"286\" height=\"409\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Writing the year before publication of Coues&#8217;s first\u00a0<em>Key<\/em>, the Canadian physician, birder, and all-around kook <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/bibliography\/14511#\/summary\">Alexander Milton Ross<\/a>\u00a0offered no indication that the &#8220;Cuvier&#8217;s golden-crested wren&#8221; was in any way remarkable. In Canada, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/50454#page\/56\/mode\/1up\">he says<\/a>,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>this wren usually accompanies the two preceeding species [namely, the golden-crowned and ruby-crowned kinglets], in their spring and fall migrations.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Ross&#8217;s were the last &#8220;sightings&#8221; of this distinctive bird, one that the American Ornithologists&#8217; Union has <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/119492#page\/371\/mode\/1up\">from the very start<\/a>\u00a0relegated to the\u00a0<em>Check-list<\/em>&#8216;s appendix of &#8220;hypothetical&#8221; species. Today, Audubon&#8217;s mystery kinglet\u00a0is thought to be most likely &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.aou.org\/checklist\/north\/pdf\/AOUchecklistAppendix-Index.pdf\">an aberrant plumage<\/a>&#8221; of the golden-crowned kinglet, but who knows? Maybe the lost specimen from Fatland Ford really was something, and the rest of us &#8212;\u00a0<em>pace\u00a0<\/em>Alexander Milton Ross &#8212; just haven&#8217;t been looking hard enough.<\/p>\n<p>Let me know the next time you run into a kinglet with a black forehead. It just might be history in the re-making.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With the recent apparent rediscovery in Ontario of the Townsend&#8217;s bunting, John James Audubon&#8217;s &#8220;nonce species&#8221; are back in the news. When pressed, most birders can name\u00a0the bunting, the small-headed flycatcher, and the two warblers; but the fifth &#8211;and the most visually appealing &#8212; of the Audubonian mysteries for some reason gets no respect. Audubon &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2014\/07\/27\/cuviers-kinglet-again\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Cuvier&#8217;s Kinglet, Again&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[232,224,235,236,233,237,142,220,234,238],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8990"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8990"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8990\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8994,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8990\/revisions\/8994"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8990"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8990"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8990"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}