{"id":4342,"date":"2012-11-15T09:15:41","date_gmt":"2012-11-15T16:15:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/?p=4342"},"modified":"2016-02-23T14:22:15","modified_gmt":"2016-02-23T21:22:15","slug":"why-i-still-say-re-introduction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/15\/why-i-still-say-re-introduction\/","title":{"rendered":"Why I Still Say &#8220;Re-introduction&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone\" src=\"http:\/\/farm3.staticflickr.com\/2596\/4144867201_497b9568e1_o.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"479\" height=\"419\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Yesterday morning, as I was writing about the return of the <strong>Wild Turkey<\/strong> to New Jersey (and our feeders), I recalled <a href=\"http:\/\/www2.aba.org\/document.doc?id=209\">Stacia Novy&#8217;s recent rant<\/a> in <em>Winging It<\/em>. I smiled when I first read it, but it&#8217;s started to rankle, this odd notion that &#8220;re-introduction&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>literally means &#8220;to introduce something again.&#8221; The Peregrine Falcon [for example, or the Wild Turkey] was never introduced to North America at any time in history, nor was the species foreign or alien. Therefore, by definition, the species cannot be reintroduced to that region&#8230;.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Huh?<\/p>\n<p>Stacia relies for her etymological argument &#8212; always dangerous &#8212; on the mistaken idea that the prefix &#8220;re-&#8221; means only &#8220;again&#8221; or &#8220;again and again,&#8221; citing an actual dictionary &#8212; always dangerous &#8212; in support of her case.<\/p>\n<p>Every elementary school teacher and every elementary school pupil knows better. The prefix is polysemic, as reading a little farther on in the dictionary would tell us. &#8220;Respond&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;to answer again and again&#8221;; it means to answer back. &#8220;Rescind&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean to &#8220;take again and again&#8221;; it means to take back. &#8220;Reverse&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean to &#8220;turn again and again&#8221;; it means to turn back.<\/p>\n<p>And &#8220;re-introduce&#8221; doesn&#8217;t mean &#8220;to introduce again&#8221;; it means to introduce <em>back<\/em>, which is precisely what we have done with condors and falcons and turkeys and otters and elk and on and on. We have &#8220;led&#8221; them &#8220;back&#8221; &#8220;in&#8221; to their original range, if we want to be pedantic and etymological (and right) about it.<\/p>\n<p>Stacia&#8217;s recommended alternative, &#8220;repatriation,&#8221; is silly enough that there&#8217;s no danger of its ever catching on. But I still find the arch pedantry of her argument (&#8220;It\u2019s hard to expect the general public to\u00a0use proper terminology on such topics\u00a0when the experts fail to do so&#8221;) troubling, and there is a small risk, I suppose, that less confident souls could be led to worry that they&#8217;re not using the term &#8220;re-introduction&#8221; properly &#8212; even though all of us members of &#8220;the general public&#8221; really are.<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;ve taken a firm resolve to use the word &#8220;re-introduction,&#8221; in its current and correct meaning, at least once a day for the next week. Says the OED:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>To return (a species of animal or plant) to a locality where it was formerly native, with the intention of re-establishing it in the wild.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My dictionary&#8217;s better than hers.<\/p>\n<p>And what about that hyphen? Well, I once sat next to someone on a plane who was reading a book titled &#8220;Reengineering,&#8221; and it took me most of the flight to figure out that it wasn&#8217;t Dutch.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yesterday morning, as I was writing about the return of the Wild Turkey to New Jersey (and our feeders), I recalled Stacia Novy&#8217;s recent rant in Winging It. I smiled when I first read it, but it&#8217;s started to rankle, this odd notion that &#8220;re-introduction&#8221; literally means &#8220;to introduce something again.&#8221; The Peregrine Falcon [for &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2012\/11\/15\/why-i-still-say-re-introduction\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Why I Still Say &#8220;Re-introduction&#8221;&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[36,7],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4342"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4342"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4351,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4342\/revisions\/4351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}