{"id":10116,"date":"2015-07-02T04:05:17","date_gmt":"2015-07-02T11:05:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/?p=10116"},"modified":"2015-06-30T15:56:38","modified_gmt":"2015-06-30T22:56:38","slug":"spoon-bill-fork-foot","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2015\/07\/02\/spoon-bill-fork-foot\/","title":{"rendered":"Spoon Bill. Fork Foot."},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/cpg-300-spoonbill.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10117\" src=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/cpg-300-spoonbill.jpg\" alt=\"cpg 300 spoonbill\" width=\"605\" height=\"956\" srcset=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/cpg-300-spoonbill.jpg 605w, http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/cpg-300-spoonbill-190x300.jpg 190w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 605px) 100vw, 605px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>This picture, from a manuscript of Konrad von Megenberg&#8217;s\u00a0<em>Buch der Natur\u00a0<\/em>produced in the famous workshop of Diebold Lauber, is mysterious in more ways than one.<\/p>\n<p>The bird is identified as a <i>zanclaffer<\/i>, a &#8220;tooth chatterer,&#8221; a name that to my knowledge occurs nowhere else for what is obviously the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.biodiversitylibrary.org\/item\/25906#page\/416\/mode\/1up\">white spoonbill<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Only adding to the apparent confusion, <a href=\"http:\/\/digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de\/diglit\/cpg300\/0347?sid=0131e204a656f5a46dfd6452f20ec51e\">the facing text<\/a> treats of a bird called &#8220;strix&#8221; in Latin, and indeed, the description is that of a nocturnal bird known for its call, likened to the sound of a scythe being drawn through the air &#8212; a descriptive tradition that is ultimately, if distantly, behind the modern name &#8220;saw-whet&#8221; for the cutest of our strigids.<\/p>\n<p>The mismatch between text and image, extreme as it is in this case, is not overly unusual in the manuscript tradition of the\u00a0<em>Buch der Natur<\/em>. Nearly 20 years ago, Gerold <a href=\"http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27711965?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents\">Hayer pointed out<\/a> that the illuminators responsible for the illustrations rarely bothered to adapt their work to the words of the text, simply lifting traditional iconographic types from herbals and bestiaries.<\/p>\n<p>What I find most striking, and most puzzling, though, is the bird&#8217;s right foot. It seems not to be just standing on that\u00a0fecklessly grinning fish, but grasping the poor creature\u00a0in its threskiornithid talons.<\/p>\n<p>Probably not a realistic scene.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t know whether there is a standard spoonbill iconography in the late Middle Ages, but if there is, I&#8217;d bet this departs from it. How to explain this bird&#8217;s weird pose?<\/p>\n<p>Hayer&#8217;s observation about the illuminators&#8217; lazy reliance on older models points to a possible answer. Another large wading\u00a0bird, the crane, is a standard member of the bestiary cast, where its spiritual vigilance is indicated by the stone\u00a0it holds in its foot. I wonder whether the designer of the leaf\u00a0in this\u00a0<em>Buch der Natur\u00a0<\/em>had that tradition in mind &#8212; or perhaps, even, a bestiary on the table in front of her or him &#8212; and decided, in a fit of contaminating inspiration, that those long legs needed something to hold. Not a stone, but, say, a fish.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll never know. But maybe it isn&#8217;t\u00a0<em>that\u00a0<\/em>much of a reach.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.bl.uk\/catalogues\/illuminatedmanuscripts\/record.asp?MSID=6549&amp;CollID=16&amp;NStart=100504\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-10118\" src=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/K060739.jpg\" alt=\"K060739\" width=\"333\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/K060739.jpg 333w, http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/K060739-200x300.jpg 200w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 333px) 100vw, 333px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This picture, from a manuscript of Konrad von Megenberg&#8217;s\u00a0Buch der Natur\u00a0produced in the famous workshop of Diebold Lauber, is mysterious in more ways than one. The bird is identified as a zanclaffer, a &#8220;tooth chatterer,&#8221; a name that to my knowledge occurs nowhere else for what is obviously the white spoonbill. Only adding to the &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/2015\/07\/02\/spoon-bill-fork-foot\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Spoon Bill. Fork Foot.&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10116"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10116"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10119,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10116\/revisions\/10119"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/birdaz.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}