Archive for Book Reviews

Jun
30

Barber: Extreme Birder

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (0)

Over at the ABA Blog today.

http://blog.aba.org/2011/06/lynn-barber-extreme-birder.html

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Book Reviews
Comments (0)

Packing means mostly sorting, and in our bibliomane household, that means books. We’ve got a special corner set aside for those volumes we’ll need the second we arrive in New Jersey–but Bill Boyle’s bfg is already in the car.

Here’s my slightly overwritten review from when this new edition was still new:

It is one of the milder species of blasphemy, I suppose, to call any book one’s “bible”; but since its appearance 17 years ago (!), Bill Boyle’s NJBFG has served thousands of the birding faithful as ritual object and authoritative companion alike. My own copy of the first printing, with its ugly laminated binding in shreds and the bookblock bulging from tipped-in notes, photocopies, and clippings, is probably the single most used volume in my birding library: field guides come and go, but for nearly two decades now, Boyle has come and gone wherever I have.

Just how intensive my use of the book has been came clear to me with the arrival–”long-awaited,” in the reviewer’s cliche–of the second edition. As I read through the new treatments of areas long familiar to me, I discovered that (like many NJ birders) I’d actually memorized verbatim great chunks of the first edition, and that I noticed every new word and every new turn of phrase in the revised accounts. If it is true that every obsession is at its base religious, then this book truly is the birder’s bible.

The birder’s bible: divine in inspiration, certainly, but here and there the mortal nature of its human author peeks through. As anyone who has ever written anything knows, it is even more difficult to revise than to write, and this revised edition has some flaws that were not apparent in the first.

There are far more copy-editing errors this time around, and the index–more important than ever, given the new book’s rather breathless layout–is not an infallible help (just try to find the main entry for Merrill Creek!). Compared to the enjoyably expansive style of the first edition, the new entries strike me as occasionally a bit too concise, a problem that might have been eased by simply eliminating even more of the old sections treating sites that, like the Institute Woods, now offer (in Boyle’s words) “the mere shadow” of their former glory; valuable space is also sacrificed to a number of new full-page illustrations.

These things having been said, the book is still an outstanding example of the bird-finding guide. The maps seem to be largely up to date and accurate (Sussex County birders: are Rockport and Blackdirt marshes really the same place?), the annotated species list is even more useful than in the first edition, and the binding isn’t likely to crackle and peel. It will take only weeks, I am sure, for New Jersey birders to start quoting this new Boyle, chapter and verse.

I was right.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (1)
Jun
08

Liguori: Hawks at a Distance

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (0)

New from Jerry Liguori and Princeton University Press:

http://blog.aba.org/2011/06/liguori-hawks-at-a-distance.html

Looking forward to using some of that new knowledge in New Jersey this fall!

  • Share/Bookmark
Mar
10

At the ABA Blog

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (0)

Over at the blog of the American Birding Association today.

http://blog.aba.org/2011/03/the-meruahan-birding-association.html

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (0)

There’s definite movement among the gulls of Vancouver this week. A California Gull was at Kitsilano Pool early this morning, and another adult was on the sewage ponds at Iona with three score Mew Gulls and 19 Thayer’s Gulls as the tide rose mid-day.

That taxon is named for John Eliot Thayer, who bankrolled the 1913 Alaska expedition that collected the first specimens. Maybe we’ll hear a little more more about him next year, the 150th anniversary of his birth–but I’ve been thinking about a different Thayer these past days.

You will have noticed all the attention being devoted to Richard Crossley’s impressive new ID Guide: for a month now, not a day has gone by without a glowing notice at one blog or another, and my own review seemed almost tardy when I “finally”–two days after receiving the book–posted it at the ABA blog.

Birders’ reactions so far (those reactions, that is to say, that have done more than just repeat the breathless jacket text) have concentrated on the guide’s plates, an entirely appropriate focus given the innovative nature of the illustrations in this book that so proudly “doesn’t like text.” And there have been some perceptive characterizations. Spencer, one of the most critically alert birders I know, has pointed out how the vitiation of perspective in the plates highlights the “constructedness” of identification texts, while several ‘bloggers’ have noticed that viewing these plates recalls the contemplation of Victorian dioramas. And not a few reviewers have compared Crossley’s photo montages to the work of Louis Agassiz Fuertes.

If all you know of Fuertes are the paintings in Pearson’s venerable Birds of America, then I suppose I can see it: there is a certain bustle to those images, particularly among the birds of prey, that anticipates in a distant way the cheek-to-jowl figures in Crossley’s plates. There is a faint stylistic echo, too, in the prominence with which the larger figures seize the foreground. But the source of each work’s pictorial density is very different: economic in the case of Birds of America, pedagogic in Crossley’s.

What many of the photographs in Crossley’s ID Guide do remind me of, and sometimes forcefully, is the work and the ideas of Abbott Thayer (no close relation, so far as I know, to John Eliot).

Look at Crossley’s owls, his grouse, his nightjars, his thrushes, and on and on, and you’ll find illustrations–literally–of the Thayerian principles of camouflage and obliteration almost as striking as the artist’s own.

abbott-thayer.blogspot.com

By the time of his death in 1921, Thayer’s theory that all coloration was ultimately and exclusively disruptive was largely dismissed as overstated and inflexible, and his influence on natural history illustration remained negligible at best for nine decades.

Maybe that’s changed now.

  • Share/Bookmark

 Subscribe in a reader

Nature Blog Network