<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peterson, All Things Reconsidered: My Birding Adventures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/</link>
	<description>The Experience of Birding!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Review Roundup: Roger Tory Peterson Edition</title>
		<link>http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-41770</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Roundup: Roger Tory Peterson Edition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 01:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/#comment-41770</guid>
		<description>[...] Aimophila Adventures [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Aimophila Adventures [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcarlson</title>
		<link>http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-586</link>
		<dc:creator>dcarlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/#comment-586</guid>
		<description>A few, random remarks on Roger Tory Petersonâ€™s prose:

	More than once, Peterson wrote that he wanted to emulate Peter Matthiessen, to write more subjective and introspective essays.  When he asked Paul Brooks, his editor at Houghton Mifflin, how to go about this, Brooks reportedly said, â€œIf you donâ€™t know, it would take too long to tell youâ€â€”a case of a friend and editor kindly saying â€œlet it be.â€  

	Petersonâ€™s strength was writing with care and clarity.  Rough drafts (housed in the Roger Tory Peterson Institute) show that he revised often and wellâ€”particularly on the sentence level.  But for the most part, he avoided â€œwriterlyâ€ and literary devices such as ornamentation, irony, indirection, and what he disparagingly called â€œsubconscious content.â€

	But there are essays out there that are memorable for their style and impact.  Birds Over America, which won the Burroughs Medal for Nature Writing in 1950, contains his best proseâ€”most notably in â€œTrailing Americaâ€™s Rarest Birdâ€ and â€œRain Shadows of the Mexican Border.â€  â€œHigh Seas in a Rowboat,â€ published in Audubon Magazine (Jan/Feb 1962) is another good example.

	As for the pieces that appeared in Bird Watcherâ€™s Digest, the most expressive moments occur in the company of death, his friendsâ€™ and his own, especially in the retelling of his near-drowning â€œCapsized by a Rogue Wave.â€  In these pieces on mortality, he makes a consistent correspondence between speciesâ€™ mortality and human mortality, between speciesâ€™ recovery and â€œresurrection.â€

	Iâ€™ve not seen the posthumous collection of essays in question, but I have read all of Petersonâ€™s BWD pieces.  They were published in a period in his life when writing wasnâ€™t a prime interest.  Peterson was a man of passion, and his passions shifted.  In his later years, it was photography, during his association with Mill Pond Press in the late 1970s-early 1980s, it was painting.  His peak writing years occurred after his Army discharge through the next two decades.  An even better posthumous collection might have selected essays from other sources as well in order to give readers a clear picture of Petersonâ€™s periodical writing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few, random remarks on Roger Tory Petersonâ€™s prose:</p>
<p>	More than once, Peterson wrote that he wanted to emulate Peter Matthiessen, to write more subjective and introspective essays.  When he asked Paul Brooks, his editor at Houghton Mifflin, how to go about this, Brooks reportedly said, â€œIf you donâ€™t know, it would take too long to tell youâ€â€”a case of a friend and editor kindly saying â€œlet it be.â€  </p>
<p>	Petersonâ€™s strength was writing with care and clarity.  Rough drafts (housed in the Roger Tory Peterson Institute) show that he revised often and wellâ€”particularly on the sentence level.  But for the most part, he avoided â€œwriterlyâ€ and literary devices such as ornamentation, irony, indirection, and what he disparagingly called â€œsubconscious content.â€</p>
<p>	But there are essays out there that are memorable for their style and impact.  Birds Over America, which won the Burroughs Medal for Nature Writing in 1950, contains his best proseâ€”most notably in â€œTrailing Americaâ€™s Rarest Birdâ€ and â€œRain Shadows of the Mexican Border.â€  â€œHigh Seas in a Rowboat,â€ published in Audubon Magazine (Jan/Feb 1962) is another good example.</p>
<p>	As for the pieces that appeared in Bird Watcherâ€™s Digest, the most expressive moments occur in the company of death, his friendsâ€™ and his own, especially in the retelling of his near-drowning â€œCapsized by a Rogue Wave.â€  In these pieces on mortality, he makes a consistent correspondence between speciesâ€™ mortality and human mortality, between speciesâ€™ recovery and â€œresurrection.â€</p>
<p>	Iâ€™ve not seen the posthumous collection of essays in question, but I have read all of Petersonâ€™s BWD pieces.  They were published in a period in his life when writing wasnâ€™t a prime interest.  Peterson was a man of passion, and his passions shifted.  In his later years, it was photography, during his association with Mill Pond Press in the late 1970s-early 1980s, it was painting.  His peak writing years occurred after his Army discharge through the next two decades.  An even better posthumous collection might have selected essays from other sources as well in order to give readers a clear picture of Petersonâ€™s periodical writing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: metaspencer</title>
		<link>http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/comment-page-1/#comment-548</link>
		<dc:creator>metaspencer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2006 13:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birdaz.com/blog/2006/09/04/peterson-all-things-reconsidered-my-birding-adventures/#comment-548</guid>
		<description>Great post -- you put Peterson in perspective for 2006 in a nice way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post &#8212; you put Peterson in perspective for 2006 in a nice way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
