Archive for May, 2006

May
26

Scrub Jay? Scrub-Jay? Scrub-Jays?

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (1)

Of all the taxonomic tangles we’ve blundered into in the last 20 years, the necklaced jays of the genus Aphelocoma are among the most impenetrable. Back when I started birding, it was relatively easy: we had only The Scrub Jay, a bright blue bird with an oddly disjunct range in the mountain west, California, and Florida. Now, of course, there are three, all proudly and prominently bearing their hyphens: the Florida Scrub-Jay, the Island Scrub-Jay, and the Western Scrub-Jay.

A fine Western Scrub-Jay was the first bird to welcome us at Catalina State Park this morning. Unlike the bright birds to our west and north, the scrub-jays here in southeast Arizona are quite dull, the markings of the head and breast relatively obscure and the blue on most individuals rather grayish; inconveniently, they are, of all the scrub-jays, the most similar to Mexican Jay, and it can take some time (or at least, it took me some time) to get a good sense of the obvious structural characters that distinguish the two. Western Scrub-Jays are longer-tailed, shorter-winged, and overall more slender than the sturdy, somewhat crow-like Mexicans; a mark that I find very useful is the fact that scrub-jays tend to flip their tails in flight, while Mexicans keep their broad, short tails in line with the axis of the body.

Another behavioral difference is the shyness of our scrub-jays. Unlike the brash familiarity of Western Scrub-Jays in California, ours here are skulky, furtive creatures, given to slipping thrasher-like from bush to bush on steep slopes, easy to miss if you don’t know their snarling whines. But nobody told this bird this morning: it was hopping around on the picnic tables with an unmistakably corvid mixture of confidence and hope, confidence that no animal in the jungle would dare take it on, and hope that these sloppy humans had left a cheeto somewhere on the ground.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (1)

The Huachuca Mountains and the upper San Pedro are hallowed ground on the North American birder’s pilgrimage route: it was here that many of our “southeast Arizona specialties” were discovered, by soldier-ornithologists in the 19th century, and birding there today always makes me feel the happy weight of tradition behind me.

Denis and I started our day at the San Pedro House, the primary access point for the San Pedro Riparian National Conservation Area. As the first Globally Important Bird Area identified in North America, this 40-mile stretch of the river is significant not only to the history of birding and ornithology but also to the history of conservation, and everything from Yellow-billed Cuckoos to beavers have benefited from its really exemplary management over the last dozen years.

No cuckoos yet today (they are exceptionally late arrivals here in the southwest), but we did come across a passel of great birds. Vermilion Flycatchers and Cassin’s Kingbirds were noisy and conspicuous in the open fields between the house and the river, and did not mask their interest in the Swainson’s Hawk that had the ill grace to fly through “their” airspace. Barn Swallows are feeding young under the house eaves.

The magnificent cottonwood gallery along the river was cool, even a bit chilly this morning, but bird activity was great. Obvious migrants included Wilson’s and 2 tardy Townsend’s Warblers, along with a few Western Tanagers and a startling female Hepatic Tanager, the first of her species I’d ever seen in the Arizona lowlands (they breed just above Sierra Vista in the Huachucas). Song Sparrows of the lovely race fallax were busy in the riverbed, many of the adults already pursued by importunate fledglings. A wonderful and extremely vocal Tropical Kingbird made up for the usual absence of kingfishers at Kingfisher Pond.

Time moves fast when you’re birding, and so it was off to Fort Huachuca. The long road across the grasslands to Garden Canyon was not particularly birdful, though we did have great looks at 2 Scaled Quail and an adult Zone-tailed Hawk. A quick pause at the upper picnic area produced 2 singing Elegant Trogons; we heard another 1 or 2 later in Sawmill Canyon.

Scheelite Canyon is one of the most beautiful localities in southeast Arizona, and it’s a good thing, because there really aren’t that many birds in there. The one constant voice as we made the steep hike was Spotted Towhee, with the occasional Bushtit and Painted Redstart for variety. We ended up walking farther than I’d planned, about 3/4 mile up the canyon. We paused to look for a nearby Canyon Wren buzzing at us from the slope, but when Denis hissed “I’ve got him,” it was clear he wasn’t talking about just the cheeky troglodyte: and sure enough, there, just off the trail, perched a Spotted Owl, happily snoozing in the shade, unaware (I hope) of its status as one of the most eagerly sought and most happily watched birds in the world.

The wind caught up with us in Sawmill Canyon, and that, the lateness of the hour, and the warmth (only about 80F, compared to 103F when we got back to Tucson!) kept the birds quiet. Grace’s Warblers serenaded us as we climbed the easy path, and a Brown Creeper reminded us how much he loved “trees, trees, oh how he loves trees!” And not far along the upper road, we heard the comical little plerping sounds we’d come for: Buff-breasted Flycatchers. In all we saw about 7 of this smallest and most beautiful of the Empidonax (notice how every bird is “the most beautiful” if you happen to have seen it that day?); several of them were perching and feeding, as is their wont, low to the ground and just a few feet from us. Amazingly enough, this bird was first collected north of Mexico in northern, not southeastern, Arizona, but nowadays it’s found at only a couple of sites in the Arizona sky islands, Sawmill perhaps the easiest.

Now all I need is an excuse to go back: guess it’s a good thing we missed Greater Pewee!

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Recent Sightings
Comments (0)
May
24

New Birds

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (0)

No, not in the sense of lifebirds, but birds that are truly new to the world: babies! 

It’s a fantastic time of year here in southeast Arizona, with the weather still bearable and an intriguing mix of dawdling migrants and busy local breeders. Darlene and I spent a couple of hours this morning at Sweetwater Wetlands. The place was quite summery, but the 45 species we came across still included a few that need to hie themselves to higher latitudes or higher altitudes, and fast: Western Wood-Pewee, Warbling Vireo, Ruby-crowned Kinglet, Wilson’s Warbler, White-crowned Sparrow.

Meanwhile, though, newly fledged Abert’s Towhees were trailing their overworked parents, and Song Sparrows were tugging at everything not tied down, hoping to add it to their nests. Drake Ruddy Ducks were engaged in blowing bubbles and making impolite sounds, and Common Yellowthroats sang and shouted everywhere. Young Harris’s Hawks could be heard squealing across the road, too. Life abundant!

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Recent Sightings
Comments (0)

I’ve put off reading this book longer than anyone I know, annoyed, I suppose, by the would-be cuteness of the title and the relentless efforts of the marketers when first it came out. But yesterday, lingering at the public library, I noticed the small volume on the new-books shelf, and figured, why not?

Why not, indeed. I still dislike the title: it feels too much like a dig at those of us who would rather be styled good birders than bad birdwatchers. But just a few pages in, I understood what Barnes was talking about, and by the time I finished this gracefully written little book, I found myself wishing, with him, that more good birders could be ‘bad birdwatchers’, too.

Originally issued for a British audience, (Bad) Birdwatcher has been revised slightly for the North American market. For the most part, the adjustments are small and effective, but there are a few pages where the literary seams show; readers not fluent in the birding cultures of both the Old World and the New will likely be thrown off, for example, when Barnes’s text passes without transition from a discussion of American treetops to a description of the song of Mistle Thrush, and there is the occasional sentence that reads all too clearly like a sop thrown to the US reader (in general, any line containing the word “chickadee” is suspect!).

But none of that mars what is really a jewel of a book, part birding memoir, part how-to guide, part low-key meditation on what it all means.

Most of the book is written in the first person, and the narration reveals an authorial persona both charming and discreet. The anecdotes recounted here never strain for a thrill, the stories never strive for a punch line. Narrow escapes from lions and locomotives fade into the background as the author focuses instead on tamer episodes, episodes not unlike those punctuating any birder’s career in the field: with the difference, of course, that Barnes is a fine writer with an almost perfect control of tone and timing, and stories that would fall flat in the telling for most of us become on these pages occasions for relish and reflection.

Most of the stories, of course, are about birds, but Barnes introduces an extensive supporting cast of “bad” birdwatching mentors and companions, each of whom he treats with affection and respect: shirtless Tim, Bob the hyrax chaser, Starr the conjurer of Central Park warblers. Most of these figures pass in and out of the narrative just as they passed in and out of the author’s birding life. One of them, though, Barnes’s father, is constantly present, even when he goes unmentioned, and it is his recurrence that gives Barnes’s story its structure and its significance.

The elder Barnes was, as the book’s dedication identifies him, “the first bad birdwatcher [the author] ever met,” and these pages trace not just the son’s progress as a birder but his changing relationship with a father who is by turns generous, uncomprehending, sensitive, and distant. Starting out as a birding team, father and son are pushed temporarily apart by teenage rebellion, professional pressures, and all the trivial accidents and incidents of family life; the illness and death of Simon Barnes’s mother, his father’s wife, was occasion for their reconciliation, and by the end of the book, we see them spending time in the field together again, enjoying the birds, the birding, and each other. This family saga is the more touching for the elegant subtlety with which Barnes retells it: no pathos, no drama, no blame and little guilt, just an occasional sober aside that lets the careful reader reconstruct a story that is both familiar and deeply felt.

The story of Barnes, his father, and, eventually, his own son Joe, is the strong skeleton of the book, the framework around which the author assembles the hints and tips promised in the book’s title. This is not, however, a typical how-to book: it does not provide the tremendous wealth of practical detail found, for example, in Pete Dunne’s On Bird Watching, or the preternatural sophistication of David Sibley’s Birding Basics. Instead, each chapter offers a simple, basic commandment: to look, to listen, to learn the importance of time and place; Barnes cuts through the techno-geek knot of the binocular debate with the Solomonic pronouncement that anything that brings the birds closer is likely to be just fine! Simplistic? Yes, probably; but again and again as I read, I found myself thinking that this is just the sort of broad-swath advice that new birders and potential birders can actually do something with, and I am considering adding this to the list of basic books I recommend to neophytes.

Where Barnes truly distinguishes himself, though, is in his thoughtful musings on what all this birding means. Too often in books of this sort, such pondering becomes ponderous, meditation becomes moralizing, and I end up flipping quickly through the last pages of each chapter, where “messages” and “conclusions” tend to lurk. Here, in contrast, the author’s thoughts grow naturally out of his observations, and there is none of the strain so evident, for example, in Dunford’s Life Birds, where deep thoughts are drawn with great effort from every clunkily narrated sighting.

If you haven’t read this book, do. And if you have, well, I envy you for having got around to it before I did.

  • Share/Bookmark
Comments (0)
May
23

Cowbird Article

Posted by: Rick Wright | Comments (0)

I’ve just noticed that Stephen Rothstein’s splendid article on the Brown-headed Cowbird is ‘up’ on the Birding website:

http://americanbirding.org/pubs/birding/archives/vol36no4p374to384.pdf

Read it and be amazed, especially if you are among those who dislike cowbirds!

  • Share/Bookmark
Categories : Information
Comments (0)

 Subscribe in a reader

Nature Blog Network